Thursday, June 26, 2008

What does "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infinged" mean to you?

Well it took over 200 years for 9 people to decide that this clause in the 2nd amendment actually meant "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed".(read the news as it breaks here).
Well i guess common sense won a great victory today, however it is disheartening to know that 4 out of those 9 justices disagreed with the ruling. Yet another clue that liberalism MUST be a mental disorder!!!

For the whopping 157 page opinion (I have not, nor will i ever, read the entire opinion) click here.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

'Well it took over 200 years for 9 people to decide that this clause in the 2nd amendment actually meant "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" '

Imagine that...
Good post babe.

Rob said...

This the perfect illustration of the backwards reasoning of the liberal dissenters.

When interpreting a clause that states "nor shall any state deprive any person life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" (14th amend.)the libs read it as saying "every woman shall have the right to abort their child".

Yet when looking at the second amendment, they see no individual protection for the right to keep and bear arms. Can this be explained?? Is the only explanation mental illness? Or is it a deliberate attempt to change the constitution without amending it? I just don't know.

Diane said...

That sounds like Michael Savage talk to me.